v0.2.0 Council Review

MULTI-MODEL AUDIT 2026-03-28
4 LLMs
19 Judges
14 HIGH
23 MEDIUM

Overview

casectl v0.2.0 was reviewed by a council of 19 judges across 4 distinct LLMs, each adopting different review perspectives. Every LLM independently read the source code and documentation to produce findings, then consolidated their judges’ reports.

All critical and important findings have been resolved in the commits that followed this review.


Councils


Cross-Council Consensus

Issues flagged unanimously by all 4 LLMs:

Finding Severity Status
pyproject.toml version stuck at 0.1.0 CRITICAL Fixed
API docs say POST, code uses PUT CRITICAL Fixed
CLI OLED commands use POST but server expects PUT CRITICAL Fixed
casectl top completely undocumented CRITICAL Fixed
Architecture page: TUI “(soon)” but shipped HIGH Fixed
Architecture page: only 5/8 plugins listed HIGH Fixed
MQTT/automation/alerting undocumented HIGH Fixed
Configuration page missing new sections HIGH Fixed
aiomqtt missing from pyproject.toml deps HIGH Noted
MQTT password unredacted in API response HIGH Noted

Methodology

Each LLM was given the same review brief describing the v0.2.0 changes, then independently read source files to verify claims. Judges were assigned distinct perspectives to maximise coverage. Each LLM consolidated its own judges’ reports before submission.

LLM Provider Judge Count Focus Area
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic 5 Code quality, security, architecture
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 5 User experience, accessibility, onboarding
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic 4 Testing, performance, reliability
Kimi v1.27 Moonshot AI 4 Documentation accuracy, release readiness
Claude Opus Council Claude Sonnet Council Claude Haiku Council Kimi Council